CasinoCityTimes.com

Gurus
News
Newsletter
Author Home Author Archives Author Books Send to a Friend Search Articles Subscribe
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter!
Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter!
Recent Articles
Best of Alan Krigman

Gaming Guru

author's picture
 

How Long Do You Have to Wait for a Decision at Craps?

31 August 2005

Make believe you're playing craps. You bet on the Pass line and the shooter establishes a point during the come-out roll. You take odds and leave it at that. No other numbers. How many throws do you expect before the decision -- before the point is repeated and you win or the seven rears its head and you lose?

A seven can be made six of the 36 ways the dice can land. A four or 10 can be formed three ways each. If either of these numbers is the point, the chance of settling the bet on any roll is then nine out of 36 or one out of four. So the theoretical average is four rolls per decision. Similar reasoning yields 3.6 and 3.27 rolls per resolution on five/nine and six/eight, respectively.

If you've bellied up to a craps table more than a few times, though, you know that averages are poor predictors of what will happen in any particular instance. Were it otherwise, nobody would ever play because the average is for you to lose an amount equal to the edge times your gross wager.

You undoubtedly remember lots of occasions when the decision came right back at you. one way or the other. And you've probably experienced games in which the shooter seemed to roll endlessly before finally making the point or sevening-out.

Just how long should it take? Computer simulation yields some ballpark figures that can help provide you with insights. For this purpose, 10,000 virtual solid citizens were programmed to hurl those hexahedrons for points of four or 10, five or nine, and six or eight. The numbers of shooters resolving each point by hitting or missing are shown in the accompanying table. The values would differ slightly, up or down, in other runs -- that's the nature of simulation as opposed to analysis.

Throws to resolve a point at craps
based on 10,000 simulated shooters

Throws Instances
4 or 10
5 or 9

6 or 8

1
2,428
2,737
3,095
2
1,862
2,123
2,097
3
1,520
1,454
1,516
4
988
1,031
961
5
778
746
771
6
659
560
474
7
477
369
303
8
302
263
227
9
266
220
180
10
169
125
99
11-20
524
367
267
over 20
27
5
10

 

The averages for the virtual shooters are close to what's theoretically "expected" from the laws of probability. A surprise is that the expected values aren't those that occur with the greatest frequency. Regardless of the point, a decision on the first roll turns out to be most common. Further, for each point, well over half the bets are resolved within the first three throws -- that is, in fewer than the expected number. These quickies are offset over the long term by the few shooters who go for extended periods before hitting the point or a seven.

Of course, true craps aficionados generally have multiple numbers working during a hand. Three is typical, for instance a point of six and Place bets on five and eight. In this case, decisions will be reached in any of six ways for the seven and 14 ways for the indicated numbers, 20 out of 36 in all. The average would be once every 1.8 throws. Of the 10,000 virtual shooters in this situation 5,487 hit one of the numbers or a seven on the first roll, followed by 2,501 on the second, and 1,091 on the third. The maximum number of rolls before a decision in this particular simulation run was 11, but in only five out of 10,000 instances.

Exclamations often heard in the craps pits are (expletives deleted) "unbelievable!" and "this is the worst table I've ever seen!" It may seem so, after awaiting a decision for what you think is a record number of throws, when you finally eke out a win or crash ignominiously. However, the simulations show that while it's easy to become accustomed to the quick turn-arounds that happen regularly, long delays aren't really remarkable. As the bettor's beloved bard, Sumner A Ingmark, knowingly noted:

Processes of long duration,
Heighten your anticipation.
Alan Krigman

Alan Krigman was a weekly syndicated newspaper gaming columnist and Editor & Publisher of Winning Ways, a monthly newsletter for casino aficionados. His columns focused on gambling probability and statistics. He passed away in October, 2013.
Alan Krigman
Alan Krigman was a weekly syndicated newspaper gaming columnist and Editor & Publisher of Winning Ways, a monthly newsletter for casino aficionados. His columns focused on gambling probability and statistics. He passed away in October, 2013.