CasinoCityTimes.com

Gurus
News
Newsletter
Author Home Author Archives Author Books Send to a Friend Search Articles Subscribe
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter!
Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter!
Recent Articles
Best of Alan Krigman

Gaming Guru

author's picture
 

The Percentages Underlying the Games Are Fact, not Opinion

12 January 2002

Many casino buffs wonder where the gambling gurus get the house advantages they blithely bandy about. And, since the authorities don't always seem to concur, how much of the information is hard fact as opposed to opinion or inference from cursory observation.

The figures espoused by ethical experts are obtained using the laws of probability. You'll occasionally see discrepancies. But these may not be true disagreements. Rather, they may result from variations in precision of the calculations, subtle differences among nominally similar games, and diverse definitions of edge.

Baccarat affords an example of the latter. Edge for this game is specified in two alternate ways. Consequently, you may notice distinct sets of percentages in two reliable sources. Yet, both may be correct and, ultimately, have equivalent bottom lines.

I'll toss you some numbers. They not only reveal how accurately relevant quantities can be known, but also demonstrate the way games of chance are described by math, not by guess 'n by gosh.

Baccarat involves two hands - Player and Banker. Solid citizens bet on either one, or on Tie. Rules for dealing, standing, and drawing are predetermined, so a computer can be set up to run through every possible way the cards in a shoe can form a pair of hands, then tally how many go to Player, Banker, and Tie.

Such a program shows that eight decks form 4,998,398,275,503,366 (that's four quadrillion, nine hundred ninety eight trillion, etc) pairs of baccarat hands. Player wins 2,230,518,282,592,260, Banker wins 2,292,252,566,437,890, and 475,627,426,473,216 are Ties. Dividing each win figure into the total four-plus quadrillion combinations gives the probabilities for Banker, Player, and Tie.

The percentages found by division could be stated with extreme precision. But this would offer no practical benefit. I only gave lots of what the pros call "significant figures" to stress the point about fact over opinion. For casino gambling purposes, 44.62 percent for Player, 45.86 percent for Banker, and 9.52 percent for Tie have enough decimal places, maybe too many.

With this single set of win percentages, edge on Player and Banker can be presented two ways. Both use the same arithmetic. Take the chance of winning times the payoff, subtract the chance of losing times the bet, and divide the result by the wager.

Ordinarily, Player and Banker push when the hands Tie. Otherwise, Player pays 1-to-1, and Banker pays even money minus a 5 percent vigorish for a net operative payoff of 0.95-to-1.

Baccarat edge may be given as a fraction of the money effectively at risk. This is what's bet, not in all rounds, but in the 90.48 percent expected to have a win or loss. It ignores money out of action in the 9.52 percent of rounds forecast to push. The probabilities are adjusted accordingly, so 0.4462/0.9048 or 49.31 percent of the decisions are predicted to go to Player and 0.4586/0.9048 or 50.69 percent to Banker. On this basis, edge on Player is [(1)(0.4931) - (1)(0.5069)]/(1) = -1.38 percent, the minus sign indicating that the house is favored. Analogously, edge on Banker is [(0.95)(0.5069) - (1)(0.4931)]/(1) = -1.15 percent, the minus sign confirming bias toward the house.

Edge on Player and Banker may also be figured by counting all rounds, including pushes. With this definition, edge on Player is [(1)(0.4462) - (1)(0.4586)]/(1) = -1.24 percent. Edge on Banker is [(0.95)(0.4586) - (1)(0.4462)]/(1) = -1.05 percent.

The two sets of figures match up when they hit the cash drawer, where it matters most. The first accounts for 1.38 and 1.15 percent of about 90.5 cents per dollar bet. The second represents 1.24 and 1.05 percent per actual dollar. After, say, 1000 rounds at $10 each, the house's theoretical "take" either way is $124 and $105 on Player and Banker, respectively. The duality recalls the rhyming reverie of the beloved bard, Sumner A Ingmark:

True understanding wipes out the confusion,
Of separate pathways reaching one conclusion.

Alan Krigman

Alan Krigman was a weekly syndicated newspaper gaming columnist and Editor & Publisher of Winning Ways, a monthly newsletter for casino aficionados. His columns focused on gambling probability and statistics. He passed away in October, 2013.
Alan Krigman
Alan Krigman was a weekly syndicated newspaper gaming columnist and Editor & Publisher of Winning Ways, a monthly newsletter for casino aficionados. His columns focused on gambling probability and statistics. He passed away in October, 2013.